Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of bibliographic data suggest a strong correlation between the growth of citation networks and their corresponding co-authorship networks. We explore the interdependence between evolving citation and co-authorship networks focused on the publications, by Indian authors, in American Physical Society journals between 1970 and 2013. We record interactions between each possible pair of authors in two ways: first, by tracing the change in citations, they exchanged and, second, by tracing the shortest path between authors in the co-authorship network. We create these data for every year of the period of our analysis. We use probability methods to quantify the correlation between citations and shortest paths, and the effect on the dynamics of the citation-co-authorship system. We find that author pairs who have a co-authorship distance \(d \le 3\) significantly affect each other’s citations, but that this effect falls off rapidly for longer distances in the co-authorship network. The exchange of citation between pairs with \(d=1\) exhibits a sudden increase at the time of first co-authorship events and decays thereafter, indicating an ageing effect in collaboration. This behaviour suggests that the dynamics of the co-authorship network appear to be driving those of the citation network rather than vice versa. Moreover, the majority of citations received by most authors are due to reciprocal citations from current, or past, co-authors. We conclude that, in order to answer questions on the nature and dynamics of scientific collaboration, it is necessary to study both co-authorship and citation network simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abachi, S., Abbott, B., Abolins, M., Acharya, B. S., Adam, I., Adams, D. L., et al. (1995). Top quark search with the d0 1992–1993 data sample. Physical Review D, 52(9), 4877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abelev, B. I., Aggarwal, M. M., Ahammed, Z., Alakhverdyants, A. V., Anderson, B. D., Arkhipkin, D., et al. (2010). Identified particle production, azimuthal anisotropy, and interferometry measurements in au+ au collisions at s nn= 9. 2 gev. Physical Review C, 81(2), 024911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amblard, F., Casteigts, A., Flocchini, P., Quattrociocchi, W., & Santoro, N. (2011). On the temporal analysis of scientific network evolution. In 2011 international conference on computational aspects of social networks (CASoN). IEEE (pp. 169–174).

  • Barabási, A.-L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Biscaro, C., & Giupponi, C. (2014). Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Maru, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(suppl 1), 5266–5273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Börner, K., & Fang, S. (2013). Evolving collaboration networks in scientometrics in 1978–2010: A micro–macro analysis. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1051–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Ma, H., Shen, Z., & Wang, K. (2017). A century of science: Globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1437–1446). ACM.

  • Fiala, D., Tutoky, G., Koncz, P., & Paralič, J. (2015). Ageing of edges in collaboration networks and its effect on author rankings. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12(6), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Teruel, A., González-Alcaide, G., Barrios, M., & Abad-García, M. (2015). Mapping recent information behavior research: An analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks. Scientometrics, 103(2), 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualdi, S., Yeung, C. H., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2011). Tracing the evolution of physics on the backbone of citation networks. Physical Review E, 84(4), 046104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., Cai, X., Hao, F., Mu, D., Fang, C., & Yang, L. (2017). Exploiting fine-grained co-authorship for personalized citation recommendation. IEEE Access, 5, 12714–12725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajra, K. B., & Sen, P. (2005). Aging in citation networks. Physica A, 346(1–2), 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higham, K. W., Governale, M., Jaffe, A. B., & Zülicke, U. (2017). Unraveling the dynamics of growth, aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1190–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Zhuang, Z., Li, J., & Giles, C. L. (2008). Collaboration over time: Characterizing and modeling network evolution. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 107–116). ACM.

  • Kas, M., Carley, K. M., & Carley, L. R. (2012). Trends in science networks: Understanding structures and statistics of scientific networks. SNAM, 2(2), 169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, B., Horn, D., Finholt, T. A., & Kaye, J. (2013). Structure and dynamics of coauthorship, citation, and impact within CSCW. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.7172.

  • Lande, D. V., & Andrushchenko, V. B. (2016). Formation of subject area and the co-authors network by sounding of Google Scholar citations service. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02215.

  • Martin, T., Ball, B., Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Coauthorship and citation patterns in the physical review. Physical Review E, 88(1), 012814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E . J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 404–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, R. K., Petersen, A. M., Pammolli, F., & Fortunato, S. (2018). The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 656–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarigöl, E., Pfitzner, R., Scholtes, I., Garas, A., & Schweitzer, F. (2014). Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X., Tseng, B., & Adamic, L. (2009). Information diffusion in computer science citation networks. In Third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.

  • Sin, S.-C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six lis journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aaf5239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, C. K., & Jolad, S. (2019). Structure and evolution of indian physics co-authorship networks. Scientometrics, 118(2), 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (2011). Credit where credit’s due: Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts. Scientometrics, 89(1), 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomassini, M., & Luthi, L. (2007). Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network. Physica A, 385(2), 750–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutoky, G., & Paralič, J. (2011). Time based modeling of collaboration social networks. In International conference on computational collective intelligence (pp. 409–418). Springer.

  • Vasques Filho, D. (2018). Structure and dynamics of social bipartite and projected networks. PhD thesis, The University of Auckland.

  • Vasques Filho, D., & O’Neale, D. R. (2020). Structure dynamics of evolving scientific networks. arXiv, pages arXiv-2005.

  • Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, G., He, X., & Butler, A. (2017). What comes first the co-authorship network or the citation?

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, C., & Tse, C. K. (2017). A network model for growth of publications and citations. Journal of Complex Networks, 5(2), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anand Sengupta, Anirban Dasgupta, Krishna Kanti Dey, Jayesh Choudhary and Amit Reza for their valuable insights and discussions during the period of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, 382355, India

    Chakresh Kumar Singh

  2. Te Pūnaha Matatini, Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

    Demival Vasques Filho & Dion R. J. O’Neale

  3. Leibniz-Institut für Europäische Geschichte, Alte Universitätsstraße 19, 55116, Mainz, Germany

    Demival Vasques Filho

  4. FLAME University, Pune, India

    Shivakumar Jolad

Authors
  1. Chakresh Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Demival Vasques Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shivakumar Jolad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dion R. J. O’Neale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chakresh Kumar Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, C.K., Filho, D.V., Jolad, S. et al. Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks. Scientometrics 125, 385–404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03616-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03616-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation